Overview
My company is taking on the challeng of building out next generation platform based on secure RESTful web services, which must be secured through OAuth and support Cross-Origin Resource Sharing (CORS).
Web Services can be implemented as SOAP and WSDL based or RESTful based. Our new platform will be implemented as RESTful based web service.
Our new platform also needs to support Cross Origin Resource Sharing, which allows third party Javascript to call our platform without being restricted to the same domain. Traditionally the browser enfoces that an AJAX can only call back to the same domain. For CORS supported browser, however, the browser can grant cross domain access if proper access is returned by the back end web services.
Our platform must be secure. After some initial investigation, we decided to go with OAuth2, the next generation of OAuth protocol. The OAuth protocol enables websites or applications (Consumers) to access Protected Resources from a web service (Service Provider) via an API, without requiring Users to disclose their Service Provider credentials to the Consumers. More generally, OAuth creates a freely-implementable and generic methodology for API authentication.
After some research and prototyping, we settle on the following set of technologies to address our particular challenges;
- Use Jersey to implement RESTful web services
- Use CORS filter to implement CORS support
- Implement and deploy on Tomcat OAuth valve class for OAuth support
In this blog series, we will illustrate the following,
- How we picked this set of technologies
- Implement Web Services using Jersey
- Enable Cross Origin Resource Sharing for Jersey
- Enable OAuth support for Jersey
- How to securely call web services using Apache HttpClient 4 library
How we picked this set of technologies
RESTful Web Services Framework
The initial candidates consist of three JAX-RS compliant RESTful Web Services framework,
| RESTful Framework | Description | Experience |
|---|---|---|
| Jersey | Jersey is the JAX-RS reference implementation from Oralce. One chooses between CDDL 1.1 license or GPL 2 with CPE license | Easy to develop and configure. Has good JSON support. No external dependency, although does offer Spring integration |
| JBoss RESTeasy | RESTeasy is maintained by Jobs and uses Apache 2.0 license |
Easy to develop with a lot of JBoss dependencies |
| Apache CXF | Apache CXF offers both WSDL-based and RESTful web services and uses Apache 2.0 license |
Easy to develop, heavy framework with a lot of dependencies and support for JAX-WS |
We prototyped in all three frameworks and they are all relatively easy to develop and configure. We decided to go with Jersey for the following reasons,
- Reference implementation
- Small set of libraries
- No external dependency
- Can easily switch if Jersey does not meet our needs in the future
Migrate to another framework
Since all three frameworks are JAX-RS compliant, the implementation classes use JAX-RS standard annotation and there is no direct dependency on the framework. If we need to swamp out Jersey with another framework, we just need to configure Tomcat web application's web.xml with framework specific configuration and deploy framework specific libraries to the lib directory.
CORS Support
We prototyped CORS support based on the following frameworks, CXF CORS support and CORS filter. We couldn't get CXF CORS to even compile, as the class structure has changed from the sample code. Once we fixed the compilation issue, we still couldn't get CORS to work through AJAX.
CORS filter, on the other hand, was a pleasure to work with. In a span of half a day, we quickly set up and integrated CORS filter with Jersey, RESTeasy, and CXF. The only drawback about CORS filter is that it is not as flexible as CXF CORS because CORS filter can only be configured at the global level, while CXF CORS can be configured at each class level, if one can get CXF CORS to work.
So, I decide to go with CORS filter as the one and only working solution.
OAuth Support
All our RESTful web services must be secured with OAuth support. There are potentially a few options on how to implement this and in the end we decided to implement this a Tomcat Valve instead of using a security realm or a servlet filter. The big advantage of implementing OAuth as a Valve is the flexibility of deploying the Valve at the Host level or at the web application level, while servlet filter can only be deployed at the web application level. More on this topic in a later blog.
No comments:
Post a Comment